Shareholders are still maintaining their rage, "where's my share of the loot?" they collectively cry, "we wus robbed!"
Well hardly, if they had participated in the Cellestis float @25c they would
still be doing OK. And if they bought their share of the capital from another party, well that is
obviously an arrangement between themselves and the seller and
absolutely nothing to do with the Company. Consenting adults, willing seller and buyer and all that stuff.
Presently there appears to be more selling than buying of shares between shareholders and this has put pressure on the share price - ultimately it is the shareholders who determine the share price.
So why is the Company to be held responsible for the performance of transactions conducted between other parties?
All very strange and no doubt part of this global spread of
denialism.